Product comparison · 2 monitors

AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor vs AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor

29specifications compared
13differ
16identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor has 2 W more RMS rated power than the AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor (4 W vs 2 W). The AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor has 6 W more power consumption (typical) than the AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor (48 W vs 42 W). The AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor has 98 mm more width (without stand) than the AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor (506 mm vs 408 mm). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor, 55.9 cm (22") on the AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor, 1680 x 1050 pixels on the AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor.

Display diagonal
- H-19 computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- H-W22 computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- H-19 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
- H-W22 computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
Pixel pitch
- H-19 computer monitor:0.285 x 0.285 mm
- H-W22 computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan range
- H-19 computer monitor:24 - 80 kHz
- H-W22 computer monitor:24 - 83 kHz
RMS rated power
- H-19 computer monitor:2 W
- H-W22 computer monitor:4 W
Tilt angle range
- H-19 computer monitor:-5 - 20°
- H-W22 computer monitor:-5 - 25°
Power consumption (typical)
- H-19 computer monitor:42 W
- H-W22 computer monitor:48 W
Width (without stand)
- H-19 computer monitor:408 mm
- H-W22 computer monitor:506 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of H-19, H-W22
37 specifications	A AG Neovo H-19 computer monitor Model H-19 View product	B AG Neovo H-W22 computer monitor Model H-W22 View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)	300 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response time	3 ms	3 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)	1000:1	1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal	170°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.285 x 0.285 mm	0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	24 - 80 kHz	24 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan range	55 - 75 Hz	55 - 75 Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55.9 cm
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	2 W	4 W
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Audio input	Yes	Yes
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
AC (power) in	Yes	Yes
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interface	100 x 100 mm	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 20°	-5 - 25°
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	42 W	48 W
Power consumption (standby)	2 W	2 W
Power consumption (off)	1 W	1 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	408 mm	506 mm
Depth (without stand)	211 mm	211 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	407 mm	405 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.1 kg	4.9 kg
Packaging data2 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	470 x 148 x 480 mm	591 x 174 x 522 mm
Package weightDiffers	5.3 kg	5.9 kg
Other features1 differ
BandwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.150 GHz
Power requirementsDiffers	100 - 240V, 50 - 60Hz	100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 h
Certification	UL/CUL, FCC, NOM, CB, CE, TUV/GS, GOST-R/HYGIENIC, Nordic, BSMI, EPA, TCO’03, WEEE, RoHS, DDC-2B, DDC-CI	UL/CUL, FCC, NOM, CB, CE, TUV/GS, GOST-R/HYGIENIC, Nordic, BSMI, EPA, TCO’03, WEEE, RoHS, DDC-2B, DDC-CI

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons