Product comparison · 2 monitors

AG Neovo 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen vs LG L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms

12specifications compared
10differ
2identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:43.2 cm (17")
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:1280 x 1024 pixels
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:1680 x 1050 pixels
Touchscreen
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:Yes
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:No
Response time
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:4 ms
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:500:1
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:3000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:140°
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:130°
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:170°
Digital vertical frequency
- 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen:50 - 75 Hz
- L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms:56 - 75 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen, L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms
39 specifications	A AG Neovo 17 “ TFT Active Matrix Screen View product	B LG L226WT-SF 22" TFT 5ms View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:10
TouchscreenDiffers	Yes	No
Display brightness (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	4 ms	5 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:10
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	3000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	140°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	130°	170°
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55.9 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 66 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyDiffers	50 - 75 Hz	56 - 75 Hz
Display brightnessKnown for one	300 cd/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen shapeKnown for one	Flat	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.264 x 0.264 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Silver
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Microphone inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DVI portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one	8-Pin Mini Dim 15-Pin D-Sub	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	35 W	45 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	502 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	234 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	424 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.7 kg
Weight (without stand)Known for one	7.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DVI
Other featuresidentical
Built-in subwooferKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	436 x 200 x 427 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	UL/CUL, TUV/ GS, CB, FCC, CE, WEEE, RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons