Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer XV322QK V3 vs Acer XZ270 X2bmiiphx

50specifications compared
21differ
29identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- XV322QK V3:80 cm (31.5")
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:68.6 cm (27")
Display resolution
- XV322QK V3:3840 x 2160 pixels
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:1920 x 1080 pixels
HD type
- XV322QK V3:4K Ultra HD
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:Full HD
Panel type
- XV322QK V3:IPS
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:VA
Display brightness (typical)
- XV322QK V3:400 cd/m²
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:250 cd/m²
Screen shape
- XV322QK V3:Flat
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:Curved
Contrast ratio (typical)
- XV322QK V3:1000:1
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:2500:1
Maximum refresh rate
- XV322QK V3:160 Hz
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:240 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of XV322QK V3, XZ270 X2bmiiphx
71 specifications	A Acer XV322QK V3 View product	B Acer XZ270 X2bmiiphx View product
Display14 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	80 cm (31.5")	68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers	3840 x 2160 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeDiffers	4K Ultra HD	Full HD
Panel typeDiffers	IPS	VA
Display brightness (typical)Differs	400 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response time measurement typeKnown for one	GTG (Gray to Gray)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen shapeDiffers	Flat	Curved
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	2500:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	160 Hz	240 Hz
Display number of coloursDiffers	1.07 billion colours	16.7 million colours
Response time (fast)Known for one	0.5 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.181 x 0.181 mm	0.311 x 0.311 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	69.8 cm	59.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	39.2 cm	33.6 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs	80 cm	68.6 cm
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyDiffers	DisplayHDR 400	High Dynamic Range 10 (HDR10)
DCI-P3 coverageKnown for one	95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-glare screenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500R
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72%
Ports & interfaces2 differ
HDMI versionDiffers	2.1	1.2
DisplayPort versionDiffers	1.4	1.2
Ergonomics3 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	75 x 75 mm
Adjustable height (max)Differs	9 cm	10 cm
SwivellingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-360 - 360°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 15°	-15 - 15°
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	G	E
Power consumption (max)Differs	70 W	48 W
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	26 W
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	External
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	715.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	267 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	560.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	10.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Known for one	715.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	89.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	427.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Known for one	7.76 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons