Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer XF243Y M3bmiiprx vs Acer XZ270 X2bmiiphx

54specifications compared
19differ
35identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:60.5 cm (23.8")
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:68.6 cm (27")
Panel type
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:TFT
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:VA
Screen shape
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:Flat
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:Curved
Contrast ratio (typical)
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:1000:1
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:2500:1
Maximum refresh rate
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:180 Hz
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:240 Hz
Pixel pitch
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:0.275 x 0.275 mm
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:0.311 x 0.311 mm
Viewable size, horizontal
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:52.7 cm
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:59.7 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- XF243Y M3bmiiprx:29.6 cm
- XZ270 X2bmiiphx:33.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of XF243Y M3bmiiprx, XZ270 X2bmiiphx
76 specifications	A Acer XF243Y M3bmiiprx View product	B Acer XZ270 X2bmiiphx View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	60.5 cm (23.8")	68.6 cm (27")
Panel typeDiffers	TFT	VA
Response time measurement typeKnown for one	GTG (Gray to Gray)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen shapeDiffers	Flat	Curved
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	2500:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	180 Hz	240 Hz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.275 x 0.275 mm	0.311 x 0.311 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	52.7 cm	59.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	29.6 cm	33.6 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs	60.5 cm	68.6 cm
Colour depthDiffers	6 bit	8 bit
sRGB coverage (typical)Known for one	99%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500R
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72%
Performanceidentical
Low Blue Light technologyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FreeSync Premium
Multimediaidentical
Built-in cameraKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics3 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable height (max)Differs	12 cm	10 cm
PivotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SwivellingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-360 - 360°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 25°	-15 - 15°
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power5 differ
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	18 kWh	21 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	27 kWh	32 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs	18 W	26 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	43 W	48 W
Power supply typeDiffers	Internal	External
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	540 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	234 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	499 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	4.57 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Known for one	540 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	66 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	323 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Known for one	3.07 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, HDMI	HDMI, Power
Bundled softwareKnown for one	VisionCare 2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons