Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer X233Hb computer monitor vs LG W1952TE-PF computer monitor

23specifications compared
16differ
7identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- X233Hb computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution
- X233Hb computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- X233Hb computer monitor:16:9
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:16:10
Response time
- X233Hb computer monitor:5 ms
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:2 ms
Aspect ratio
- X233Hb computer monitor:16:9
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:16:10
Viewing angle, horizontal
- X233Hb computer monitor:176°
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- X233Hb computer monitor:176°
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:170°
Pixel pitch
- X233Hb computer monitor:0.265 x 0.265 mm
- W1952TE-PF computer monitor:0.2835 x 0.2835 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X233Hb, W1952TE-PF
35 specifications	A Acer X233Hb computer monitor Model X233Hb View product	B LG W1952TE-PF computer monitor Model W1952TE-PF View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	58.4 cm (23")	48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	1440 x 900 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	2 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	176°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	176°	170°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.265 x 0.265 mm	0.2835 x 0.2835 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 80 kHz	30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	55 - 75 Hz	56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	51 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	28.7 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	31.7 W	20 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.76 W	0.3 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.72 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	561.6 mm	452 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	177.5 mm	104 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	393.3 mm	371 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	6.57 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.6 kg
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	UL, CUL, TUV/GS, T-Mark, ISO9241-3/-7/-8, FCC/B, VCCI, CE, TCO03, C-tick, BSMI, WHQL, ISO 13402-6	TCO'03, UL, cUL, TUV-GS, SEMCO, FCC-B, EPA
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons