Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer X163Wb computer monitor vs Samsung 943N computer monitor

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 6identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • X163Wb computer monitor:40.6 cm (16")
    • 943N computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • X163Wb computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
    • 943N computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • X163Wb computer monitor:250 cd/m²
    • 943N computer monitor:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • X163Wb computer monitor:8 ms
    • 943N computer monitor:5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • X163Wb computer monitor:500:1
    • 943N computer monitor:1000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • X163Wb computer monitor:90°
    • 943N computer monitor:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • X163Wb computer monitor:65°
    • 943N computer monitor:160°
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • X163Wb computer monitor:55 W
    • 943N computer monitor:34 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of X163Wb, 943N
41 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers40.6 cm (16")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1366 x 768 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs500:11000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers90°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers65°160°
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.252 x 0.252 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 80 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one55 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one34.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one19.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs55 W34 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Differs380.8 mm405.6 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs154.9 mm199.8 mm
Height (with stand)Differs295.5 mm413.5 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.9 kg3.8 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source479 x 411.9 x 132 mm
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source479 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source411.9 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source132 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.94 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright3/off timer/color effect/customized key/MagicWizard & MagicTune with AssetManagement/Windows Vista Basic/safe mode (DownScaling in UXGA)
Set depth (with stand) (inch)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 cm (7.87")
Set height (with stand) (inch)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41.4 cm (16.3")
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one75 x 75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons