Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer V233H bmd vs LG W2453SQ-PF computer monitor

27specifications compared
16differ
11identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- V233H bmd:58.4 cm (23")
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:61 cm (24")
Response time
- V233H bmd:5 ms
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:2 ms
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- V233H bmd:40000:1
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:50000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- V233H bmd:160°
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- V233H bmd:160°
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:170°
Pixel pitch
- V233H bmd:0.265 x 0.265 mm
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:0.276 x 0.276 mm
Horizontal scan range
- V233H bmd:54.2 - 83.8 kHz
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan range
- V233H bmd:49 - 75 Hz
- W2453SQ-PF computer monitor:56 - 75 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of V233H bmd, W2453SQ-PF
48 specifications	A Acer V233H bmd View product	B LG W2453SQ-PF computer monitor Model W2453SQ-PF View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	58.4 cm (23")	61 cm (24")
Display resolution	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)	300 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)	1000:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	40000:1	50000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	170°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.265 x 0.265 mm	0.276 x 0.276 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	54.2 - 83.8 kHz	30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	49 - 75 Hz	56 - 75 Hz
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	sRGB
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display refresh rates supportedKnown for one	60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Built-in camera	No	No
RMS rated powerKnown for one	3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI-I ports quantity	0	0
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDCP	Yes	Yes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	31.7 W	42 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.72 W	1 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.72 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	582.3 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	212 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	444.4 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.34 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	544.5 mm	582.3 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	221.8 mm	66.3 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	390.8 mm	430.9 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	7.1 kg	5.09 kg
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
CertificationDiffers	TCO’03	F Engine ezZooming sRGB DDC/CI HDCP Intelligent Auto Plug & Play DDC2B Forte Manager
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Power requirementsKnown for one	100V - 240V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
PivotKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons