Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer V193WA computer monitor vs Samsung SM933SN computer monitor

19specifications compared
10differ
9identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- V193WA computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- SM933SN computer monitor:47 cm (18.5")
Display resolution
- V193WA computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- SM933SN computer monitor:1360 x 768 pixels
Viewing angle, horizontal
- V193WA computer monitor:160°
- SM933SN computer monitor:170°
Panel mounting interface
- V193WA computer monitor:100 x 100 mm
- SM933SN computer monitor:75 x 75 mm
Power consumption (typical)
- V193WA computer monitor:22.1 W
- SM933SN computer monitor:23 W
Power consumption (standby)
- V193WA computer monitor:0.85 W
- SM933SN computer monitor:1 W
Width (without stand)
- V193WA computer monitor:441.8 mm
- SM933SN computer monitor:453 mm
Depth (without stand)
- V193WA computer monitor:161.5 mm
- SM933SN computer monitor:70 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of V193WA, SM933SN
46 specifications	A Acer V193WA computer monitor Model V193WA View product	B Samsung SM933SN computer monitor Model SM933SN View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	47 cm (18.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1360 x 768 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	170°
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.284 x 0.284 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 80 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	55 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	40.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	25.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	-5 - 15°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stand-by
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	22.1 W	23 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.85 W	1 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.59 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	441.8 mm	453 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	161.5 mm	70 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	360.1 mm	300 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.3 kg	3.65 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	408 x 255 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	50000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power managementKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	UL, CUL, TUV/GS, T-Mark, ISO9241-3/-7/-8, FCC/B, VCCI, CE, TCO03, C-tick,BSMI,WHQL, ISO 13406-2	Unknown — not stated by the source
MultimediaKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons