Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor vs EIZO S2243W-Photo computer monitor

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 10identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
  • Display resolution
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:1920 x 1200 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:16:9
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:16:10
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:250 cd/m²
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:350 cd/m²
  • Aspect ratio
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:16:9
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:16:10
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:100000000:1
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:1200:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:170°
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:178°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • S2 S222HQLCbid computer monitor:160°
    • S2243W-Photo computer monitor:178°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of S222HQLCbid, S2243W-Photo
47 specifications
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1200 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²350 cd/m²
Response timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)720 x 400, 1024 x 768 (XGA), 1152 x 864 (XGA+), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1600 x 1200 (UXGA), 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA), 640 x 480 (VGA), 800 x 600 (SVGA)
Aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs100000000:11200:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°178°
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source31 - 76 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source59 - 61 Hz
HD typeKnown for oneFull HDUnknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers02
HDMI ports quantityDiffers10
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
VESA mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slotDiffersYesNo
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsDiffersYesPower
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs23.90 W90 W
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source511 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source208.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source521 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.6 kg
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source511 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85 mm
Height (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source333 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.6 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneDVI, VGAUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons