Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer S200HQL Cbd vs Acer S277HK wmidpp

42specifications compared
25differ
17identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- S200HQL Cbd:49.5 cm (19.5")
- S277HK wmidpp:68.6 cm (27")
Display resolution
- S200HQL Cbd:1600 x 900 pixels
- S277HK wmidpp:3840 x 2160 pixels
HD type
- S200HQL Cbd:HD
- S277HK wmidpp:4K Ultra HD
Panel type
- S200HQL Cbd:TN+Film
- S277HK wmidpp:IPS
Display brightness (typical)
- S200HQL Cbd:200 cd/m²
- S277HK wmidpp:300 cd/m²
Response time
- S200HQL Cbd:5 ms
- S277HK wmidpp:4 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- S200HQL Cbd:1600 x 900
- S277HK wmidpp:3840 x 2160
Display number of colours
- S200HQL Cbd:16.78 million colours
- S277HK wmidpp:1.073 billion colours

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of S200HQL Cbd, S277HK wmidpp
54 specifications	A Acer S200HQL Cbd View product	B Acer S277HK wmidpp View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	49.5 cm (19.5")	68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
Native aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Display technology	LED	LED
Touchscreen	No	No
HD typeDiffers	HD	4K Ultra HD
Panel typeDiffers	TN+Film	IPS
Display brightness (typical)Differs	200 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	4 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1600 x 900	3840 x 2160
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)	100000000:1	100000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	90°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	50°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursDiffers	16.78 million colours	1.073 billion colours
3D	No	No
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	No	Yes
Built-in camera	No	No
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI port	Yes	Yes
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	0	1
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomics1 differ
VESA mounting	No	No
Panel mounting interface	No	No
Cable lock slotDiffers	No	Yes
Height adjustment	No	No
PivotKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivelling	No	No
Tilt adjustment	Yes	Yes
Tilt angle range	-5 - 15°	-5 - 15°
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	16.2 W	49.87 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.45 W	0.47 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.35 W	0.4 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	120 - 230 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 kWh
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	469.9 mm	613.9 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	166.9 mm	153.9 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	330.2 mm	451.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	2.3 kg	5.4 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	464.8 mm	614.7 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	33 mm	111.8 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	281.9 mm	406.4 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	2.04 kg	4.94 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, VGA	AC, DisplayPort, DVI, HDMI
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TV tuner integrated	No	No
CertificationKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter type	LED	LED
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	C
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installed	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons