Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer RT0 RT270 computer monitor vs Acer XF251Q bmiirx

28specifications compared
5differ
23identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- RT0 RT270 computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
- XF251Q bmiirx:62.2 cm (24.5")
Response time
- RT0 RT270 computer monitor:4 ms
- XF251Q bmiirx:1 ms
Feet colour
- RT0 RT270 computer monitor:Silver
- XF251Q bmiirx:Black
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
- RT0 RT270 computer monitor:18 kWh
- XF251Q bmiirx:23 kWh
Cables included
- RT0 RT270 computer monitor:VGA
- XF251Q bmiirx:HDMI, VGA

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RT270, XF251Q bmiirx
56 specifications	A Acer RT0 RT270 computer monitor Model RT270 View product	B Acer XF251Q bmiirx View product
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	62.2 cm (24.5")
Response timeDiffers	4 ms	1 ms
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1080p
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160°
Panel typeKnown for one	IPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
RMS rated powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 W
Design1 differ
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gaming
Feet colourDiffers	Silver	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Height adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Adjustable height (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.5 cm
Power1 differ
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	18 kWh	23 kWh
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	17.6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	558.8 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	269.2 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	505.5 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.62 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	VGA	HDMI, VGA
Other featuresidentical
RotatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons