Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer RC1 RC271Usmidpx vs Acer SA230 computer monitor

49specifications compared
20differ
29identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:68.6 cm (27")
- SA230 computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:2560 x 1440 pixels
- SA230 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
HD type
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:Quad HD
- SA230 computer monitor:Full HD
Display brightness (typical)
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:350 cd/m²
- SA230 computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Supported graphics resolutions
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:2560 x 1440
- SA230 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modes
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:1440p
- SA230 computer monitor:1080p
Product colour
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:Black, Silver
- SA230 computer monitor:Black
Feet colour
- RC1 RC271Usmidpx:Silver
- SA230 computer monitor:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RC271U, SA230
60 specifications	A Acer RC1 RC271Usmidpx Model RC271U View product	B Acer SA230 computer monitor Model SA230 View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1440 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Display technology	LED	LED
Touchscreen	No	No
HD typeDiffers	Quad HD	Full HD
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Display brightness (typical)Differs	350 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response time	4 ms	4 ms
Screen shape	Flat	Flat
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	2560 x 1440	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modesDiffers	1440p	1080p
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)	100000000:1	100000000:1
Maximum refresh rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	178°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	178°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of colours	16.78 million colours	16.78 million colours
3D	No	No
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	Yes	Yes
Number of speakers	2	2
RMS rated power	2 W	2 W
Built-in camera	No	No
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Silver	Black
Feet colourDiffers	Silver	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	0	1
DVI port	Yes	Yes
HDMI ports quantity	1	1
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot	No	No
Height adjustment	No	No
Tilt adjustment	Yes	Yes
Tilt angle range	-5 - 15°	-5 - 15°
SwivellingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	23.7 W	23 W
Power consumption (standby)	0.45 W	0.45 W
Power consumption (average)Known for one	27 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)	0.4 W	0.4 W
Energy efficiency scaleDiffers	A+++ to D	A to G
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	39 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	D
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13 kWh
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	614 mm	531.1 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	201 mm	212.1 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	445 mm	402.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.8 kg	2.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	614 mm	530.9 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	37.1 mm	35.6 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	364 mm	320 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.4 kg	2.22 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Stand included	Yes	Yes
Cables includedDiffers	AC, DVI, DisplayPort	VGA
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificates	ENERGY STAR	ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
AC adapter included	Yes	Yes
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certification	MPR II	MPR II
Supplied AC adapter type	LED	LED
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installed	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons