Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer Predator XF270Hbmjdprz vs Acer XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor

54specifications compared
17differ
37identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:68.6 cm (27")
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:61 cm (24")
Display brightness (typical)
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:300 cd/m²
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:350 cd/m²
Pixel pitch
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:0.311 x 0.311 mm
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:0.276 x 0.276 mm
Viewable size, horizontal
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:59.8 cm
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:53.1 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:33.6 cm
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:29.9 cm
Built-in USB hub
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:Yes
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:No
Cable lock slot
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:Yes
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:No
Power consumption (typical)
- Predator XF270Hbmjdprz:26.5 W
- XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor:23 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Predator XF270Hbmjdprz, XF240Hbmjdpr
73 specifications	A Acer Predator XF270Hbmjdprz View product	B Acer XF XF240Hbmjdpr computer monitor Model XF240Hbmjdpr View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	61 cm (24")
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
Display surfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Matt
Screen shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Flat
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	144 Hz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.311 x 0.311 mm	0.276 x 0.276 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	59.8 cm	53.1 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	33.6 cm	29.9 cm
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	100000000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Built-in USB hubDiffers	Yes	No
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
HDMIKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Audio inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Headphone outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB hub versionKnown for one	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Cable lock slotDiffers	Yes	No
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pivot angleKnown for one	0 - 90°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-60 - 60°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	26.5 W	23 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.45 W	0.55 W
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	56 kWh	51 kWh
Weight & dimensions6 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	639.7 mm	567 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	408.1 mm	385.5 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.35 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	639.7 mm	567 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	61.8 mm	60.7 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	380.8 mm	335.9 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	7.8 kg	3.84 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons