Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer P195HQLbd computer monitor vs Dell 3008WFP computer monitor

24specifications compared
13differ
11identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:47 cm (18.5")
- 3008WFP computer monitor:76.2 cm (30")
Display resolution
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
- 3008WFP computer monitor:2560 x 1600 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- 3008WFP computer monitor:370 cd/m²
Response time
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:5 ms
- 3008WFP computer monitor:8 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:176°
- 3008WFP computer monitor:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:176°
- 3008WFP computer monitor:178°
Pixel pitch
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:0.300 x 0.300 mm
- 3008WFP computer monitor:0.2505 x 0.2505 mm
Power consumption (typical)
- P195HQLbd computer monitor:17 W
- 3008WFP computer monitor:163 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of P195HQLbd, 3008WFP
43 specifications	A Acer P195HQLbd computer monitor Model P195HQLbd View product	B Dell 3008WFP computer monitor Model 3008WFP View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	47 cm (18.5")	76.2 cm (30")
Display resolutionDiffers	1366 x 768 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	370 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	8 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	176°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	176°	178°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.300 x 0.300 mm	0.2505 x 0.2505 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	41 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	23 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 80 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	55 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3000:1
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Graphics design
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	-5 - 15°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	17 W	163 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.87 W	2 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.64 W	1 W
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	444.7 mm	696.6 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	190.5 mm	237.4 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	348.7 mm	482.1 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.7 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	50000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	CE, TÜV GS, MPRII, ISO 13406-2	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons