Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE vs Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 4identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver has 40 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE (290 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver has 5 ms more response time than the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE (25 ms vs 20 ms). The Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver has 70 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE (500:1 vs 430:1). Pixel pitch: 0.264 x 0.264 mm on the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, 0.264 on the Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver. Horizontal scan range: 31.5 - 80 kHz on the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, 30 - 81 kHz on the Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver.

  • Display brightness (typical)
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:250 cd/m²
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:290 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:20 ms
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:25 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:430:1
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:500:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:160°
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:150°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:130°
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:120°
  • Pixel pitch
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:0.264 x 0.264 mm
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:0.264
  • Horizontal scan range
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:31.5 - 80 kHz
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:30 - 81 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:56.3 - 75 Hz
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:56 - 75 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver
26 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonal43.2 cm (17")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution1280 x 1024 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²290 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers20 ms25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs430:1500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°150°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers130°120°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.264 x 0.264 mm0.264
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31.5 - 80 kHz30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56.3 - 75 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one33.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one27 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers75 x 75 mm100 x 100 mm
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs48 W34 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs393 mm382 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs159.8 mm175 mm
Height (without stand)Differs377 mm383 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5 kg4.6 kg
Other features1 differ
Audio systemKnown for oneSpeakers 2X1WUnknown — not stated by the source
Video inKnown for oneAnalog (D-sub)Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersISO 13406-2, UL, EN60950, EN - 55022, MPR 1990, CSA, CB, TUV-GS, FCC-B, CE, TCO'99TCO99
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 pin D-Sub

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons