Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE vs Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 5identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE has 8 ms more response time than the Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed (20 ms vs 12 ms). The Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed has 170 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE (600:1 vs 430:1). Pixel pitch: 0.264 x 0.264 mm on the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, 0.264 on the Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed. Horizontal scan range: 31.5 - 80 kHz on the Acer MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, 30 - 81 kHz on the Samsung K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed.

  • Display brightness (typical)
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:250 cd/m²
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:20 ms
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:12 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:430:1
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:600:1
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:130°
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:160°
  • Pixel pitch
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:0.264 x 0.264 mm
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:0.264
  • Horizontal scan range
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:31.5 - 80 kHz
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:30 - 81 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:56.3 - 75 Hz
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:56 - 75 Hz
  • Panel mounting interface
    • MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE:75 x 75 mm
    • K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed:100 x 100 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MONITOR AL1715 17 LCD ANALOOG TCO99 ACER WHITE, K 710N 17" TFT .264 81kHz+Need f Speed
27 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonal43.2 cm (17")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution1280 x 1024 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers20 ms12 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs430:1600:1
Viewing angle, horizontal160°160°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers130°160°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.264 x 0.264 mm0.264
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31.5 - 80 kHz30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56.3 - 75 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one33.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one27 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers75 x 75 mm100 x 100 mm
Plug and PlayYesYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one48 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs393 mm370 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs159.8 mm381 mm
Height (without stand)Differs377 mm175 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5 kg4.35 kg
Other features1 differ
Audio systemKnown for oneSpeakers 2X1WUnknown — not stated by the source
Video inKnown for oneAnalog (D-sub)Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersISO 13406-2, UL, EN60950, EN - 55022, MPR 1990, CSA, CB, TUV-GS, FCC-B, CE, TCO'99TCO99
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.135 GHz
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15pin D-sub

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons