Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer K272HUL Dbmidpx vs Acer Z271 bmiphz

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 17identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display resolution
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:2560 x 1440 pixels
    • Z271 bmiphz:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • HD type
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:Quad HD
    • Z271 bmiphz:Full HD
  • Panel type
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:IPS
    • Z271 bmiphz:VA
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:350 cd/m²
    • Z271 bmiphz:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:6 ms
    • Z271 bmiphz:4 ms
  • Supported graphics resolutions
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:2560 x 1440
    • Z271 bmiphz:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
  • Display number of colours
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:1.073 billion colours
    • Z271 bmiphz:16.78 million colours
  • Product colour
    • K272HUL Dbmidpx:Black
    • Z271 bmiphz:Black, Red

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of K272HUL Dbmidpx, Z271 bmiphz
53 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonal68.6 cm (27")68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers2560 x 1440 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio16:916:9
Display technologyLEDLED
TouchscreenNoNo
HD typeDiffersQuad HDFull HD
Panel typeDiffersIPSVA
Display brightness (typical)Differs350 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers6 ms4 ms
Screen shapeFlatFlat
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers2560 x 14401920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source178°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source178°
Display number of coloursDiffers1.073 billion colours16.78 million colours
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one100000000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)YesYes
Number of speakersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Design1 differ
Market positioningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGaming
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Red
Ports & interfacesidentical
Built-in USB hubKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of upstream portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI ports quantity11
DisplayPorts quantity11
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
Ethernet LANNoNo
Ergonomics3 differ
VESA mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slotNoNo
Height adjustmentDiffersNoYes
Adjustable height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 cm
SwivellingDiffersNoYes
Tilt adjustmentYesYes
Tilt angle range-5 - 25°-5 - 25°
LED indicatorsDiffersPowerYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs40 W27 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.4 W
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one58 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source619 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source268.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source519 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7.6 kg
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source619 mm
Other featuresidentical
On/off switchYesYes
No flickeringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Supplied AC adapter typeLEDLED
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for oneBUnknown — not stated by the source
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedNoNo
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneAC, DVI, DisplayPortUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons