Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer H233H computer monitor vs LG W2242TE computer monitor

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 10identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • H233H computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
    • W2242TE computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
  • Display resolution
    • H233H computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • W2242TE computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • H233H computer monitor:16:9
    • W2242TE computer monitor:16:10
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • H233H computer monitor:300 cd/m²
    • W2242TE computer monitor:250 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • H233H computer monitor:2 ms
    • W2242TE computer monitor:5 ms
  • Aspect ratio
    • H233H computer monitor:16:9
    • W2242TE computer monitor:16:10
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • H233H computer monitor:170°
    • W2242TE computer monitor:160°
  • Pixel pitch
    • H233H computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
    • W2242TE computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of H233H, W2242TE
49 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers58.4 cm (23")55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers2 ms5 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°160°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.248 x 0.248 mm0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Colour gamut standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcesRGB
HD typeKnown for oneFull HDUnknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one250:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one40000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
RMS rated powerKnown for one3 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers100 x 100 mm75 x 75 mm
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 15°-5 - 20°
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs31.7 W22 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.76 W0.3 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.72 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source516 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source418 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.7 kg
Width (without stand)Differs561.6 mm516 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs177.5 mm63 mm
Height (without stand)Differs393.9 mm346 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one4.77 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source473.86 x 296.16 mm
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 – 264 Vac, 47 – 63 Hz
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcesRGB, HDCP,Flatron f Engine, Intelligent Auto, Auto resolution, 4:3 in Wide (ARC)
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDDC 2B
CertificationDiffersCE, TÜV GS, ISO 13406-2TÜV-Typ, CE, EPA Energy Star, UL, CSA, SEMKO, FCC-B, TCO03
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one50000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Power managementKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons