Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer GF246 computer monitor vs Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor

45specifications compared
14differ
31identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor has 4.32 W more power consumption (typical) than the Acer GF246 computer monitor (24.12 W vs 19.8 W). The Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor has 0.02 W more power consumption (standby) than the Acer GF246 computer monitor (0.48 W vs 0.46 W). The Acer GF246 computer monitor has 0.1 W more power consumption (off) than the Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor (0.45 W vs 0.35 W). Display diagonal: 61 cm (24") on the Acer GF246 computer monitor, 68.6 cm (27") on the Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor. Cables included: AC, DisplayPort, VGA on the Acer GF246 computer monitor, DisplayPort, VGA on the Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor.

Display diagonal
- GF246 computer monitor:61 cm (24")
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
Power consumption (typical)
- GF246 computer monitor:19.8 W
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:24.12 W
Power consumption (standby)
- GF246 computer monitor:0.46 W
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:0.48 W
Power consumption (off)
- GF246 computer monitor:0.45 W
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:0.35 W
Annual energy consumption
- GF246 computer monitor:25 kWh
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:31 kWh
Width (with stand)
- GF246 computer monitor:565 mm
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:639 mm
Height (with stand)
- GF246 computer monitor:343 mm
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:442 mm
Weight (with stand)
- GF246 computer monitor:3.83 kg
- GF276bmipx computer monitor:4.6 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GF246, GF276bmipx
51 specifications	A Acer GF246 computer monitor Model GF246 View product	B Acer GF276bmipx computer monitor Model GF276bmipx View product
Display1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	61 cm (24")	68.6 cm (27")
Performanceidentical
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SwivellingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power4 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	19.8 W	24.12 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.46 W	0.48 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.45 W	0.35 W
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	25 kWh	31 kWh
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	565 mm	639 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	343 mm	442 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.83 kg	4.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	565 mm	639 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	42 mm	40 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	343 mm	284 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.45 kg	3.96 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, DisplayPort, VGA	DisplayPort, VGA
Other features1 differ
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LED	AC
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons