Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer Gateway HX2000 vs Acer X233H bd

26specifications compared
13differ
13identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- Gateway HX2000:50.8 cm (20")
- X233H bd:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- Gateway HX2000:1600 x 900 pixels
- X233H bd:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- Gateway HX2000:250 cd/m²
- X233H bd:300 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- Gateway HX2000:50000:1
- X233H bd:40000:1
Pixel pitch
- Gateway HX2000:0.2768 x 0.2768 mm
- X233H bd:0.265 x 0.265 mm
Power consumption (typical)
- Gateway HX2000:48 W
- X233H bd:31.7 W
Power consumption (off)
- Gateway HX2000:1 W
- X233H bd:0.72 W
Width (without stand)
- Gateway HX2000:525 mm
- X233H bd:561.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Gateway HX2000, X233H bd
46 specifications	A Acer Gateway HX2000 View product	B Acer X233H bd View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	50000:1	40000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2768 x 0.2768 mm	0.265 x 0.265 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54.2 - 83.8 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	49 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	51 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	28.7 cm
Display refresh rates supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
RMS rated powerKnown for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
PC Audio inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC (power) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	48 W	31.7 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.76 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	1 W	0.72 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	525 mm	561.6 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	109 mm	177.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	393 mm	393.9 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.3 kg	4.8 kg
Other features2 differ
Power requirementsDiffers	100-240V, 50/60Hz, AC	100V - 240V
CertificationDiffers	UL, VCCI, FCC, NOM, CE, TUV/GS, RoHS, MPRII	TCO’03
Dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one	525 x 109 x 392.9 mm (20.7 x 4.29 x 15.5")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one	534.9 x 118.9 x 411 mm (21.1 x 4.68 x 16.2")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons