Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer G205HV BD vs Samsung S22A650D computer monitor

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 11identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • G205HV BD:50.8 cm (20")
    • S22A650D computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
  • Display resolution
    • G205HV BD:1600 x 900 pixels
    • S22A650D computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Supported graphics resolutions
    • G205HV BD:1600 x 900
    • S22A650D computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • G205HV BD:5000:1
    • S22A650D computer monitor:3000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • G205HV BD:90°
    • S22A650D computer monitor:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • G205HV BD:50°
    • S22A650D computer monitor:160°
  • Supplied AC adapter type
    • G205HV BD:LCD
    • S22A650D computer monitor:AC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of G205HV BD, S22A650D
46 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers50.8 cm (20")54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers1600 x 900 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio16:916:9
TouchscreenNoNo
HD typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFull HD
Display brightness (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1600 x 9001920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs5000:13000:1
Dynamic contrast ratio marketing nameKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMega Contrast
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers90°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers50°160°
3DKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity00
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
AC (power) inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 x 100,200 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotNoNo
PivotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source29 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.4 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source510.5 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source215.9 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source363.2 mm
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source510.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40.6 mm
Height (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source58.4 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.08 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source581.7 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source160 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source381 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.08 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceVGA
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integratedNoNo
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEPEAT Gold, TCO
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersLCDAC
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedNoNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons