Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer G205HV BD vs Acer T231H bmid

17specifications compared
8differ
9identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- G205HV BD:50.8 cm (20")
- T231H bmid:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- G205HV BD:1600 x 900 pixels
- T231H bmid:1920 x 1080 pixels
Touchscreen
- G205HV BD:No
- T231H bmid:Yes
Response time
- G205HV BD:5 ms
- T231H bmid:2 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- G205HV BD:1600 x 900
- T231H bmid:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Viewing angle, horizontal
- G205HV BD:90°
- T231H bmid:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- G205HV BD:50°
- T231H bmid:176°
Built-in speaker(s)
- G205HV BD:No
- T231H bmid:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of G205HV BD, T231H bmid
51 specifications	A Acer G205HV BD View product	B Acer T231H bmid View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
TouchscreenDiffers	No	Yes
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 cd/m²
Display brightnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	2 ms
Screen shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Flat
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1600 x 900	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1080p
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	90°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	50°	176°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
3DKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	5000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	No	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DVI portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDMIKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35.50 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.890 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 - 220 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	563 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	82 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	395 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.94 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
Quick start guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC, CE

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons