Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer eMachines E202HEb vs Dell 3008WFP computer monitor

24specifications compared
12differ
12identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- eMachines E202HEb:50.8 cm (20")
- 3008WFP computer monitor:76.2 cm (30")
Display resolution
- eMachines E202HEb:1600 x 900 pixels
- 3008WFP computer monitor:2560 x 1600 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- eMachines E202HEb:300 cd/m²
- 3008WFP computer monitor:370 cd/m²
Response time
- eMachines E202HEb:5 ms
- 3008WFP computer monitor:8 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- eMachines E202HEb:160°
- 3008WFP computer monitor:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- eMachines E202HEb:160°
- 3008WFP computer monitor:178°
Pixel pitch
- eMachines E202HEb:0.2768 x 0.2768 mm
- 3008WFP computer monitor:0.2505 x 0.2505 mm
Power consumption (typical)
- eMachines E202HEb:40 W
- 3008WFP computer monitor:163 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of eMachines E202HEb, 3008WFP
38 specifications	A Acer eMachines E202HEb View product	B Dell 3008WFP computer monitor Model 3008WFP View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	76.2 cm (30")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	370 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	8 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2768 x 0.2768 mm	0.2505 x 0.2505 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 80 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	55 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3000:1
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Graphics design
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	40 W	163 W
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	371 mm	696.6 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	100 mm	237.4 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	265 mm	482.1 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.5 kg	10.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
Power requirementsKnown for one	100 - 240 V, 50 / 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons