All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer ED320Q W0 vs Philips Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 42specifications compared
  • 21differ
  • 21identical
  • 65known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor has 5 :9 more native aspect ratio than the Acer ED320Q W0 (21:9 vs 16:9). The Acer ED320Q W0 has 0.7 ms more response time than the Philips Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor (1 ms vs 0.3 ms). The Philips Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor has 1,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Acer ED320Q W0 (4000:1 vs 3000:1). Only the Acer ED320Q W0 has built-in speaker(s). Display diagonal: 80 cm (31.5") on the Acer ED320Q W0, 86.4 cm (34") on the Philips Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 80 cm (31.5")
    • 86.4 cm (34")
  • Display resolution
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
    • 3440 x 1440 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 16:9
    • 21:9
  • HD type
    • Full HD
    • UltraWide Quad HD
  • Panel type
    • VA
    • Fast VA
  • Response time
    • 1 ms
    • 0.3 ms
  • Screen shape
    • Curved
    • Flat
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 3000:1
    • 4000:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
107 specifications
A

Acer

ED320Q W0View product
B

Philips

Evnia 5000 34M2C5500Q/67 computer monitor

Model 34M2C5500Q/67

View product
Display14 differ
Display diagonalDiffers80 cm (31.5")86.4 cm (34")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels3440 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:921:9
HD typeDiffersFull HDUltraWide Quad HD
Panel typeDiffersVAFast VA
LED backlightKnown for oneYes
Backlight typeKnown for oneW-LED
Response timeDiffers1 ms0.3 ms
Response time measurement typeKnown for oneGTG (Gray to Gray)
Screen shapeDiffersCurvedFlat
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:14000:1
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one200 Hz
Display number of coloursKnown for one1.07 billion colours
Pixel pitchDiffers0.364 x 0.364 mm0.07725 x 0.23175 mm
Pixel densityKnown for one110 ppi
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one48 - 100 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers69.8 cm79.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers39.3 cm33.4 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs80 cm86.36 cm
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyDiffersHigh Dynamic Range 10 (HDR10)High Dynamic Range (HDR) 400
DDC/CIKnown for oneYes
Surface hardnessKnown for one3H
Colour gamut standardKnown for onesRGB, NTSC, DCI-P3, Adobe RGB
sRGB coverage (typical)Differs99%98%
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one101%
Adobe RGB coverageKnown for one99%
DCI-P3 coverageKnown for one89%
Display sRGBKnown for oneYes
Display panel sizeKnown for one34 inch / 86.36 cm
Display brightness (typical)Known for one250 cd/m²
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneYes
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one1500R
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one100000000:1
Performanceidentical
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for oneYes
Flicker-free technologyKnown for oneYes
AMD FreeSyncKnown for oneYes
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for oneFreeSync Premium
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)DiffersYesNo
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Built-in USB hubKnown for oneNo
HDMI versionDiffers2.12.0
HDCPKnown for oneYes
HDCP versionKnown for one2.3
Ergonomicsidentical
Height adjustmentKnown for oneYes
Adjustable height (max)Known for one13 cm
SwivellingKnown for oneYes
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesKnown for onePortuguese, Czech, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Spanish, Swedish, Traditional Chinese, Turkish, Ukrainian
Power4 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)DiffersDNot available
Energy efficiency class (HDR)DiffersGNot available
Power consumption (typical)Differs65 W35.88 W
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50/60 Hz
Power supply typeDiffersExternalInternal
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one21 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one33 kWh
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to G
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3658 m
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 12192 m
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one808 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one311 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one529 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one8.16 kg
Width (without stand)Known for one808 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one117 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one369 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one6.2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one980 mm
Package depthKnown for one226 mm
Package heightKnown for one525 mm
Package weightKnown for one11.1 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneEvnia Precision Center
Other featuresidentical
Low input lagKnown for oneYes
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneDDC/CI, sRGB, Windows 11 / 10, macOS
Exterior finish typeKnown for oneTextured
EasyRead modeKnown for oneYes
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneSeparate Sync
Philips SmartUniformityKnown for one93 - 105%
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one50000 h
Delta EKnown for one2
MultiViewKnown for oneYes
Picture enhancementKnown for oneSmartImage game
Regulatory ApprovalsKnown for oneCB, CE Mark, ETL, CEC, CEL, CCC, CECP, UKCA, EMF, FCC, ICES-003
User controlsKnown for onePower On/Off, Menu/OK, Input/Up, Game Settings/Down, SmartImage game/Back

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons