All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer ED320Q W0 vs AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 16identical
  • 44known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer ED320Q W0 has 0.97 ms more response time than the AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor (1 ms vs 0.03 ms). The AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor has 147,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Acer ED320Q W0 (150000:1 vs 3000:1). Display diagonal: 80 cm (31.5") on the Acer ED320Q W0, 68.6 cm (27") on the AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Acer ED320Q W0, 3840 x 2160 pixels on the AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor. Panel type: VA on the Acer ED320Q W0, OLED on the AOC U27G4D/11 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 80 cm (31.5")
    • 68.6 cm (27")
  • Display resolution
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
    • 3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Panel type
    • VA
    • OLED
  • Response time
    • 1 ms
    • 0.03 ms
  • Screen shape
    • Curved
    • Flat
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 3000:1
    • 150000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.364 x 0.364 mm
    • 0.153 x 0.153 mm
  • Power supply type
    • External
    • Internal

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
68 specifications
A

Acer

ED320Q W0View product
B

AOC

U27G4D/11 computer monitor

Model U27G4D/11

View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers80 cm (31.5")68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Display technologyKnown for oneLCD
TouchscreenKnown for oneNo
HD typeKnown for oneFull HD
Panel typeDiffersVAOLED
Display brightness (typical)Known for one250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers1 ms0.03 ms
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneYes
Screen shapeDiffersCurvedFlat
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one1500R
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:1150000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one100000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.364 x 0.364 mm0.153 x 0.153 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one69.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one39.3 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Known for one80 cm
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyKnown for oneHigh Dynamic Range 10 (HDR10)
sRGB coverage (typical)Known for one99%
LED backlightKnown for oneYes
Response time measurement typeKnown for oneGTG (Gray to Gray)
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one165 Hz
Display number of coloursKnown for one1.07 billion colours
Pixel densityKnown for one163 ppi
Performanceidentical
AMD FreeSyncKnown for oneYes
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for oneFreeSync Premium
Flicker-free technologyKnown for oneYes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYes
Built-in cameraKnown for oneNo
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for oneGaming
Product colourKnown for oneBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
DisplayPort out versionKnown for one1.4
Headphone outKnown for oneYes
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.4
Audio outputKnown for oneYes
Built-in KVM switchKnown for oneNo
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Ergonomicsidentical
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneYes
PivotKnown for oneYes
Pivot angleKnown for one-90 - 90°
SwivellingKnown for oneYes
Picture-in-PictureKnown for oneYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneD
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for oneG
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one21 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one33 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Known for one65 W
Power supply typeDiffersExternalInternal
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to G
Other featuresidentical
Low input lagKnown for oneYes
Bezel thickness typeKnown for oneFrameless
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one70000 h

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons