Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer ED320Q W0 vs AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor

23specifications compared
8differ
15identical
46known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor has 147,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Acer ED320Q W0 (150000:1 vs 3000:1). Display diagonal: 80 cm (31.5") on the Acer ED320Q W0, 68.6 cm (27") on the AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Acer ED320Q W0, 2560 x 1440 pixels on the AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor. Panel type: VA on the Acer ED320Q W0, OLED on the AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor. Screen shape: Curved on the Acer ED320Q W0, Flat on the AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor.

Display diagonal
- ED320Q W0:80 cm (31.5")
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
Display resolution
- ED320Q W0:1920 x 1080 pixels
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:2560 x 1440 pixels
Panel type
- ED320Q W0:VA
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:OLED
Screen shape
- ED320Q W0:Curved
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:Flat
Contrast ratio (typical)
- ED320Q W0:3000:1
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:150000:1
Pixel pitch
- ED320Q W0:0.364 x 0.364 mm
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:0.2292 x 0.2292 mm
Tilt angle range
- ED320Q W0:-5 - 20°
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:-5 - 23°
Power supply type
- ED320Q W0:External
- AGP277QKD computer monitor:Internal

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ED320Q W0, AGP277QKD
69 specifications	A Acer ED320Q W0 View product	B AOC AGP277QKD computer monitor Model AGP277QKD View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	80 cm (31.5")	68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Display technologyKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
TouchscreenKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for one	Full HD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeDiffers	VA	OLED
Display brightness (typical)Known for one	250 cd/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Response timeKnown for one	1 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-glare screenKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Screen shapeDiffers	Curved	Flat
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one	1500R	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	3000:1	150000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	100000000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontal	178°	178°
Viewing angle, vertical	178°	178°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.364 x 0.364 mm	0.2292 x 0.2292 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	69.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	39.3 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonal (metric)Known for one	80 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
High Dynamic Range (HDR) supported	Yes	Yes
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyKnown for one	High Dynamic Range 10 (HDR10)	Unknown — not stated by the source
sRGB coverage (typical)Known for one	99%	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED backlightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	540 Hz
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.073 billion colours
Pixel densityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110.82 ppi
Performanceidentical
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for one	FreeSync Premium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flicker-free technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	Yes	Yes
Built-in cameraKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
RMS rated powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 W
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Gaming	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI	Yes	Yes
HDMI ports quantity	2	2
HDMI version	2.1	2.1
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort out versionKnown for one	1.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Built-in KVM switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDCP versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.2
Ergonomics1 differ
VESA mounting	Yes	Yes
Panel mounting interface	100 x 100 mm	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slot	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slot type	Kensington	Kensington
Tilt adjustment	Yes	Yes
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 20°	-5 - 23°
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
PivotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pivot angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-90 - 90°
SwivellingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Picture-in-PictureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	D	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	21 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	33 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	65 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)	0.5 W	0.5 W
Power consumption (off)	0.3 W	0.3 W
Power supply typeDiffers	External	Internal
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Low input lagKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Bezel thickness typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Frameless

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons