Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer B346CK bmijphzx vs Acer XF270HU bmijdpr

35specifications compared
16differ
19identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer B346CK bmijphzx has 880 x 1440 pixels more display resolution than the Acer XF270HU bmijdpr (3440 x 1440 pixels vs 2560 x 1440 pixels). The Acer B346CK bmijphzx has 5 :9 more native aspect ratio than the Acer XF270HU bmijdpr (21:9 vs 16:9). The Acer XF270HU bmijdpr has 30 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Acer B346CK bmijphzx (350 cd/m² vs 320 cd/m²). Only the Acer XF270HU bmijdpr has DVI port. Display diagonal: 86.4 cm (34") on the Acer B346CK bmijphzx, 68.6 cm (27") on the Acer XF270HU bmijdpr.

Display diagonal
- B346CK bmijphzx:86.4 cm (34")
- XF270HU bmijdpr:68.6 cm (27")
Display resolution
- B346CK bmijphzx:3440 x 1440 pixels
- XF270HU bmijdpr:2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- B346CK bmijphzx:21:9
- XF270HU bmijdpr:16:9
HD type
- B346CK bmijphzx:Full HD
- XF270HU bmijdpr:Quad HD
Display brightness (typical)
- B346CK bmijphzx:320 cd/m²
- XF270HU bmijdpr:350 cd/m²
Response time
- B346CK bmijphzx:6 ms
- XF270HU bmijdpr:4 ms
Aspect ratio
- B346CK bmijphzx:21:9
- XF270HU bmijdpr:16:9
Display number of colours
- B346CK bmijphzx:1.073 billion colours
- XF270HU bmijdpr:16.78 million colours

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of B346CK bmijphzx, XF270HU bmijdpr
47 specifications	A Acer B346CK bmijphzx View product	B Acer XF270HU bmijdpr View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	86.4 cm (34")	68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers	3440 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	21:9	16:9
HD typeDiffers	Full HD	Quad HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	320 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	6 ms	4 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers	21:9	16:9
Display number of coloursDiffers	1.073 billion colours	16.78 million colours
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2560 x 1440
Multimediaidentical
Number of speakersKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gaming
Ports & interfaces1 differ
DVI portDiffers	No	Yes
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomics2 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs	15 cm	12.7 cm
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 25°	-5 - 35°
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	53.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	120 - 230 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	828 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	266.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Differs	589.3 mm	863.6 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	9.98 kg	9.07 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB	AC, DVI, HDMI, USB, VGA
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	EPEAT Gold	ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	RoHS, TCO 6.0	RoHS
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons