Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site vs Acer R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site

Add a product
  • 39specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 22identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site has 1 ms more response time than the Acer R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site (5 ms vs 4 ms). The Acer R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site has 1 more HDMI ports quantity than the Acer B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site (1 vs 0). The Acer B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site has 9 kWh more energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours than the Acer R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site (22 kWh vs 13 kWh). Only the Acer R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site has DVI port. Only the Acer B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site has height adjustment.

  • Display diagonal
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:61 cm (24")
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:58.4 cm (23")
  • Response time
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:5 ms
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:4 ms
  • DVI port
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:No
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:Yes
  • HDMI ports quantity
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:0
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:1
  • Height adjustment
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:Yes
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:No
  • Energy efficiency class (SDR)
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:F
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:D
  • Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:22 kWh
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:13 kWh
  • Width (with stand)
    • B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site:567 mm
    • R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site:531 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of B246HLymdr + Ext 3Y on site, R231bmid + Ext 3Y on site
58 specifications
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers61 cm (24")58.4 cm (23")
Response timeDiffers5 ms4 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one170°Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one160°Unknown — not stated by the source
3DKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPS
Multimediaidentical
Number of speakersKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Feet colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfaces2 differ
DVI portDiffersNoYes
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
Ergonomics1 differ
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Height adjustmentDiffersYesNo
PivotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for onePowerUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt adjustmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 15°
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)DiffersFD
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers22 kWh13 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one110 - 220 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.45 W
Power consumption (average)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source23 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.4 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs567 mm531 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs221.2 mm224 mm
Height (with stand)Differs535.5 mm402 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs6.09 kg2.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs567 mm531 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs52 mm35.7 mm
Height (without stand)Differs335.9 mm320 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.44 kg2.2 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Stand includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT GoldENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
CertificationKnown for oneTCO 6.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersLEDAC

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons