Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer B196Lymdr + 3Y on site vs Acer K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site

52specifications compared
27differ
25identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:48.3 cm (19")
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:68.6 cm (27")
Display resolution
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:1280 x 1024 pixels
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:5:4
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:16:9
HD type
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:SXGA
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:Quad HD
Panel type
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:TN+Film
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:IPS
Display brightness (typical)
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:250 cd/m²
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:350 cd/m²
Response time
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:5 ms
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:6 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- B196Lymdr + 3Y on site:1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
- K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site:2560 x 1440

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of B196Lymdr + 3Y on site, K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site
64 specifications	A Acer B196Lymdr + 3Y on site View product	B Acer K/B276HULAymiidprz + Ext 3Y on site View product
Display12 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	5:4	16:9
HD typeDiffers	SXGA	Quad HD
Panel typeDiffers	TN+Film	IPS
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	6 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1280 x 1024 (SXGA)	2560 x 1440
Aspect ratioDiffers	5:4	16:9
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.294 x 0.294 mm	0.233 x 0.233 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	37.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	30.1 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	1 W	2 W
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Built-in USB hubDiffers	No	Yes
USB hub versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	0
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	0	2
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Swivel angle rangeDiffers	-60 - 60°	-90 - 90°
Power5 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	F	G
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	18 kWh	32 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs	15.8 W	32.8 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.45 W	0.49 W
AC input voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	110 - 220 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	640 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	247 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	558 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8.51 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	406.4 mm	640 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	221 mm	62 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	519.2 mm	381 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.33 kg	6 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CE, TÜV GS, ISO9241-307, TCO6.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons