Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer B193W Dbmdh vs ASUS VH198T computer monitor

28specifications compared
10differ
18identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Display brightness (typical)
- B193W Dbmdh:300 cd/m²
- VH198T computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- B193W Dbmdh:10000:1
- VH198T computer monitor:10000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- B193W Dbmdh:160°
- VH198T computer monitor:170°
Pixel pitch
- B193W Dbmdh:0.283 x 0.283 mm
- VH198T computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
Tilt angle range
- B193W Dbmdh:-5 - 15°
- VH198T computer monitor:-5 - 20°
Width (without stand)
- B193W Dbmdh:440.2 mm
- VH198T computer monitor:0 mm
Depth (without stand)
- B193W Dbmdh:198.5 mm
- VH198T computer monitor:0 mm
Height (without stand)
- B193W Dbmdh:413.6 mm
- VH198T computer monitor:0 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of B193W Dbmdh, VH198T
48 specifications	A Acer B193W Dbmdh View product	B ASUS VH198T computer monitor Model VH198T View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonal	48.3 cm (19")	48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution	1440 x 900 pixels	1440 x 900 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	10000:1	10000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.283 x 0.283 mm	0.248 x 0.248 mm
Horizontal scan range	30 - 80 kHz	30 - 80 kHz
Vertical scan range	55 - 75 Hz	55 - 75 Hz
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 80 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 - 75 Hz
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	1000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display refresh rates supportedKnown for one	75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated power	2 W	2 W
Built-in camera	No	No
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
DVI-I ports quantity	0	0
Headphone connectivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 mm
PC Audio inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDCP	Yes	Yes
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slot	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slot type	Kensington	Kensington
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 15°	-5 - 20°
Adjustable height (max)Known for one	8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	0 - 35°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	445 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	205 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	387 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	440.2 mm	0 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	198.5 mm	0 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	413.6 mm	0 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.4 kg	4.2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	555 x 139 x 430 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.5 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DVI, VGA
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integrated	No	No
CertificationDiffers	TCO’03	UL/cUL, CB, FCC, CCC, BSMI, Gost-R, C-Tick, VCCI, WHQL
Power requirementsKnown for one	100V - 240V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.55 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.55 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	16.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons