Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer AL2223WB computer monitor vs Philips 190B8CS/00 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 6identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:2500:1
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:3000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:160°
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:176°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:160°
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:0.282
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:0.294
  • Horizontal scan range
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:31 - 81 kHz
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • AL2223WB computer monitor:47.3 cm
    • 190B8CS/00 computer monitor:37.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AL2223WB, 190B8CS/00
43 specifications
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs2500:13000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2820.294
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31 - 81 kHz30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan range56 - 75 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.3 cm37.6 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers29.6 cm30.1 cm
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSilver
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI-D ports quantity11
Headphone outputsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interface100 x 100 mm100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
Adjustable height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 cm
Swivel angle rangeDiffers-30 - 30°60 - 60°
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 20°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs65 W36 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.7 W1 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Differs514 mm422 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs258 mm198.8 mm
Height (with stand)Differs391 mm411.2 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.36 kg
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source422 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source68.7 mm
Height (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source374.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features2 differ
Power requirementsDiffers100 - 240 VAC, 50 - 60 HzAC 100 - 240V, 50/60Hz
CertificationDiffersUL, CUL, TUV/GS, T-mark, ISO 13406-2, CE, CB, TCO 03, FCCCE Mark, EMC, FCC-B, UL, CSA, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons