Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer A221HQb computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 12identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00 has 19,950,000 :1 more contrast ratio (dynamic) than the Acer A221HQb computer monitor (20000000:1 vs 50000:1). The Acer A221HQb computer monitor has 6° more viewing angle, vertical than the Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00 (176° vs 170°). The Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00 has 2 more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity than the Acer A221HQb computer monitor (2 vs 0). Only the Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00 has cable lock slot. Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the Acer A221HQb computer monitor, 55.9 cm (22") on the Philips Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00.

  • Display diagonal
    • A221HQb computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:55.9 cm (22")
  • Display resolution
    • A221HQb computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:1680 x 1050 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • A221HQb computer monitor:16:9
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:16:10
  • Aspect ratio
    • A221HQb computer monitor:16:9
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:16:10
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • A221HQb computer monitor:50000:1
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:20000000:1
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • A221HQb computer monitor:176°
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:170°
  • USB Type-A downstream ports quantity
    • A221HQb computer monitor:0
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:2
  • Cable lock slot
    • A221HQb computer monitor:No
    • Brilliance LED monitor with Ergo base, USB, Audio 220BL2CB/00:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of A221HQb, 220BL2CB/00
63 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs50000:120000000:1
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers176°170°
Pixel pitchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
HD typeKnown for oneFull HDUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
3DKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 W
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers02
Audio inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Audio outputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
AC (power) inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Cable lock slotDiffersNoYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
Adjustable height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 cm
Swivel angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-65 - 65°
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 20°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStand-by
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs30 W22.5 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.79 W0.1 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.67 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 60 °C
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source484 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source249 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source505 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.17 kg
Width (without stand)Differs511 mm351 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs371 mm59 mm
Height (without stand)Differs199 mm505 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.5 kg4.15 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source468 x 175 x 565 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.92 kg
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100-240 VAC, 50/60 Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30000 h
CertificationDiffersMPR II WEEEEPEAT Gold, EnergyStar 5.0, RoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, FCC, Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.0, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, UL/cUL
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons