Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer 271HL bid vs Acer G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor

37specifications compared
6differ
31identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 271HL bid:68.6 cm (27")
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
Display brightness (typical)
- 271HL bid:250 cd/m²
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:200 cd/m²
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 271HL bid:170°
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:90°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 271HL bid:160°
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:50°
AC input voltage
- 271HL bid:100 - 240 V
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:110 - 220 V
Supplied AC adapter type
- 271HL bid:LCD
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:LED

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 271HL bid, G226HQLBbd
56 specifications	A Acer 271HL bid View product	B Acer G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor Model G226HQLBbd View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolution	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Touchscreen	No	No
HD type	Full HD	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	200 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Supported graphics resolutions	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modes	1080p	1080p
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)	100000000:1	100000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	90°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	50°
Display number of colours	16.78 million colours	16.78 million colours
3D	No	No
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in camera	No	No
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
HDCP	Yes	Yes
AC (power) in	Yes	Yes
HDMIKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ethernet LAN	No	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slot	No	No
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
LED indicators	Power	Power
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.450 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.400 W
AC input voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	110 - 220 V
AC input frequency	50 - 60 Hz	50 - 60 Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	5 - 35 °C	5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)	20 - 80%	20 - 80%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	510.5 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	167.6 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	365.8 mm
Width (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	510.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.8 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	364 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guide	Yes	Yes
Manual	Yes	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports	0	0
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO9241-307
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MPRII
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LCD	LED
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installed	No	No
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons