Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer S1 201HLbd computer monitor vs Acer Essential 235HLbd computer monitor

Add a product
  • 32specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 22identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:50.8 cm (20")
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
  • Display resolution
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:1600 x 900 pixels
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Supported graphics resolutions
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:1600 x 900
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:12000000:1
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:100000000:1
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:0.55 W
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:0.62 W
  • Power consumption (off)
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:0.44 W
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:0.51 W
  • Width (without stand)
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:474 mm
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:542 mm
  • Depth (without stand)
    • S1 201HLbd computer monitor:145 mm
    • Essential 235HLbd computer monitor:38.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 201HLbd, 235HLbd
49 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers50.8 cm (20")58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers1600 x 900 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio16:916:9
Display technologyKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
TouchscreenNoNo
Panel typeKnown for oneTN+FilmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)250 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1600 x 9001920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs12000000:1100000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal170°170°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Display number of colours16.78 million colours16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.276 x 0.276 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 80 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one55 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
3DNoNo
HD typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFull HD
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity00
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
HDMI ports quantity00
HDCPYesYes
AC (power) inYesYes
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotNoNo
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one-5 - 15°Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsPowerPower
Power2 differ
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.55 W0.62 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.44 W0.51 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28.2 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 220 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs474 mm542 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs145 mm38.6 mm
Height (without stand)Differs350 mm327 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.8 kg3 kg
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source541 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source178 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source394 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.1 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Supplied AC adapter typeLCDLCD
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedNoNo
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC, DVI, VGA

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons