Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer 200HL Abd vs Acer G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor

29specifications compared
10differ
19identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 200HL Abd:50.8 cm (20")
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolution
- 200HL Abd:1600 x 900 pixels
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- 200HL Abd:250 cd/m²
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:200 cd/m²
Supported graphics resolutions
- 200HL Abd:1600 x 900
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 200HL Abd:170°
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:90°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 200HL Abd:160°
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:50°
Power consumption (standby)
- 200HL Abd:0.6 W
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:0.450 W
Power consumption (off)
- 200HL Abd:0.53 W
- G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor:0.400 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 200HL Abd, G226HQLBbd
56 specifications	A Acer 200HL Abd View product	B Acer G6 G226HQLBbd computer monitor Model G226HQLBbd View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	200 cd/m²
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1600 x 900	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1080p
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	90°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	50°
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.6 W	0.450 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.53 W	0.400 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	510.5 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	167.6 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	365.8 mm
Width (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	510.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.8 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	364 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	AC, DVI, VGA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO9241-307
CertificationDiffers	MPR II	MPRII
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LCD	LED
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons