Product comparison · 2 monitors

Acer 173 DJb vs Acer S222HQL computer monitor

29specifications compared
15differ
14identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 173 DJb:43.2 cm (17")
- S222HQL computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolution
- 173 DJb:1280 x 1024 pixels
- S222HQL computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- 173 DJb:20000:1
- S222HQL computer monitor:12000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 173 DJb:160°
- S222HQL computer monitor:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 173 DJb:160°
- S222HQL computer monitor:170°
Pixel pitch
- 173 DJb:0.264 x 0.264 mm
- S222HQL computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
DVI-D ports quantity
- 173 DJb:0
- S222HQL computer monitor:2
HDCP
- 173 DJb:No
- S222HQL computer monitor:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 173 DJb, S222HQL
50 specifications	A Acer 173 DJb View product	B Acer S222HQL computer monitor Model S222HQL View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
HD typeKnown for one	HD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)	250 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1280 x 1024 (SXGA)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	20000:1	12000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	170°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.264 x 0.264 mm	0.248 x 0.248 mm
3DKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 80 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 - 75 Hz
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Built-in camera	No	No
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	0	2
DVI-I ports quantity	0	0
HDMI ports quantity	0	0
HDCPDiffers	No	Yes
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slot type	Kensington	Kensington
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Power	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 15°
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	13.9 W	23.9 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.58 W	0.69 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	110 - 220 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	376 mm	509 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	160.2 mm	166 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	370.2 mm	371 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.8 kg	2.9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificates	ENERGY STAR	ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integrated	No	No
CertificationDiffers	EPEAT Silver, TCO’03	CE, CB, UL, FCC, GS, ERGO, WEEE, ISO9241-307, Energystar 5.0
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30000 h
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons