Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor vs Samsung 793S monitor CRT

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 0identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor has 0.02 more pixel pitch than the Samsung 793S monitor CRT (0.25 vs 0.23). The Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor has 12 kg more weight than the Samsung 793S monitor CRT (26.3 kg vs 14.3 kg). Display diagonal: 55.9 cm (22") on the Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung 793S monitor CRT. Type: Shadow mask Real Flat CRT on the Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor, CRT / Anti-static, multi-layer coating on the Samsung 793S monitor CRT. Display resolution: 1024 x 768 pixels on the Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Samsung 793S monitor CRT.

  • Display diagonal
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:55.9 cm (22")
    • 793S monitor CRT:43.2 cm (17")
  • Display resolution
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
    • 793S monitor CRT:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Maximum resolution
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:2048 x 1536 pixels
    • 793S monitor CRT:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:0.25
    • 793S monitor CRT:0.23
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:501 x 466 x 501 mm
    • 793S monitor CRT:401 x 410 x 378 mm
  • Weight
    • 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:26.3 kg
    • 793S monitor CRT:14.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor, 793S
26 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")43.2 cm (17")
TypeDiffersShadow mask Real Flat CRTCRT / Anti-static, multi-layer coating
Display resolutionDiffers1024 x 768 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one29.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one39.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one5.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one50 - 160 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 130 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionDiffers2048 x 1536 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.250.23
Recommended resolutionKnown for one1600 x 1200Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceShadow mask
Features1 differ
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one90 - 90°Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one-5 - 25°Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE Mark, E2000, FCC-B, UL, CSA, FDA, NUTEK, Energy Star, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV ErgoPlug and Play, TCO '03, CE, MPR II, CSA, UL, TUV, TUV GS, VCCI, C-Tick, BSMI, GOST, CCIB, DDC-2B, DDC-2Bi, Energy 2000, EPA Energy Star, NEMKO, NOM, VESA DPMS, PSB, MIC, EK
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one215 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90, AC 110/230 V ( 50/60 Hz )
Management featuresidentical
Control panelKnown for oneBrightness control, Contrast control, Left / right, Menu, Power on / off, Up / downUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-25 - 65 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 80%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs501 x 466 x 501 mm401 x 410 x 378 mm
WeightDiffers26.3 kg14.3 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 98/ME/2000/XPUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons