Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT vs Viewsonic Q71B monitor CRT

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Viewsonic Q71B monitor CRT has 1.3 cm more viewable size, vertical than the LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT (24.3 cm vs 23 cm). The Viewsonic Q71B monitor CRT has 1.5 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT (32.5 cm vs 31 cm). The LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT has 6 kg more weight than the Viewsonic Q71B monitor CRT (21 kg vs 15 kg). Only the Viewsonic Q71B monitor CRT has mac compatibility.

  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 17.0" FLATRON CRT:23 cm
    • Q71B monitor CRT:24.3 cm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 17.0" FLATRON CRT:31 cm
    • Q71B monitor CRT:32.5 cm
  • Weight
    • 17.0" FLATRON CRT:21 kg
    • Q71B monitor CRT:15 kg
  • Mac compatibility
    • 17.0" FLATRON CRT:No
    • Q71B monitor CRT:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 17.0" FLATRON CRT, Q71B
33 specifications
B

Viewsonic

Q71B monitor CRT

Model Q71B

View product
Display2 differ
Viewable size, verticalDiffers23 cm24.3 cm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers31 cm32.5 cm
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280 x 1024 pixels
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 70 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Display dot pitch (horizontal)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.23 mm
Display sRGBKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
TypeKnown for oneCRTUnknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one1280 x 1024 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one50 - 160 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 70 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.24Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationDiffersSafety: UL, CSA, TUV-GS, SEMCO EMC: FCC-B, CE, VCCI-2 X-RAY: DHHS, HWC, ROV Low Radiation: TCO 95, MPR-II Ergonomics: TCO 95, ISO9241-3, 7, 8 Power Saving: TCO 95, EPA Energy Star ETC: GOST, C-TICKUL/cUL, DHHS, FCC-B, ICES-003, CB, MPR II, TUV/GS, TUV/Ergo, Argentina-TUV/S, NOM
Audio systemKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 W
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90-264V, 50/60Hz
Power sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Monitor typical power consumptionKnown for one73 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 - 104 °F
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source402 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source425 mm
WeightDiffers21 kg15 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source410 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one460 x 439 x 440 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17.5 kg
System requirements1 differ
Mac compatibilityDiffersNoYes
Technical detailsidentical
Monitor max. video input bandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 MHz
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneInterface: 15 Pin D-Sub Communication: DDC 2BUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for oneBrightness, Contrast, Color, Position, Size, Shape, Setup, SpecialUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons