Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT vs Philips 202P75 22" real flat QXGA CRT monitor

Add a product
  • 1specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 0identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

Weight: 21 kg on the LG 17.0" FLATRON CRT, 26.34 g on the Philips 202P75 22" real flat QXGA CRT monitor.

  • Weight
    • 17.0" FLATRON CRT:21 kg
    • 202P75 22" real flat QXGA CRT monitor:26.34 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 17.0" FLATRON CRT, 202P75/75
38 specifications
Displayidentical
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2048 x 1536 pixels
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 130 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Display dot pitch (horizontal)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.21 mm
Display recommended refresh rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85 Hz
Display sRGBKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Recommended display area(inch)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39.1 cm (15.4")
Sync input impedanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2200 Ω
Video input impedanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 Ω
Display diagonalKnown for one43.2 cm (17")Unknown — not stated by the source
TypeKnown for oneCRTUnknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one1280 x 1024 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one23 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one31 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one50 - 160 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 70 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.24Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 25°
Audio systemKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneSafety: UL, CSA, TUV-GS, SEMCO EMC: FCC-B, CE, VCCI-2 X-RAY: DHHS, HWC, ROV Low Radiation: TCO 95, MPR-II Ergonomics: TCO 95, ISO9241-3, 7, 8 Power Saving: TCO 95, EPA Energy Star ETC: GOST, C-TICKUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source125 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Monitor typical power consumptionKnown for one73 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 65 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 35 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Depth (with base)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source46.6 cm
WeightDiffers21 kg26.34 g
Width (with base)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50.1 cm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one460 x 439 x 440 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Technical detailsidentical
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source466 mm
Dot clock scanning frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 MHz
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source501 mm
ResolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2048 x 1536 pixels
Video Dot RateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 MHz
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneInterface: 15 Pin D-Sub Communication: DDC 2BUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for oneBrightness, Contrast, Color, Position, Size, Shape, Setup, SpecialUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons