Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT vs Philips 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor

16specifications compared
12differ
4identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Viewable size diagonal
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:40.4 cm
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:41 cm
Vertical scan range
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:50 - 120 Hz
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan range
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:30 - 69 kHz
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:30 - 71 kHz
Pixel pitch
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:0.27
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:0.25 x 0.21 mm
Swivel angle range
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:45 - 45°
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:90 - 90°
Tilt angle range
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:-4 - 15°
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:-5 - 13°
Power consumption (typical)
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:90 W
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:62 W
Depth
- CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT:421 mm
- 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor:423.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of E74, 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor
34 specifications	A Lenovo CRT Essential E74 monitor CRT Model E74 View product	B Philips 17" Real Flat CRT Monitor View product
Display4 differ
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	40.4 cm	41 cm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	50 - 120 Hz	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 69 kHz	30 - 71 kHz
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	306 x 230 mm
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.27	0.25 x 0.21 mm
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	640 x 480 @ 60 Hz, 640 x 480 @ 85Hz, 720 x 400 @ 70 Hz, 800 x 600 @ 75 Hz, 800 x 600 @ 85 Hz, 1024 x 768 @ 75 Hz, 1024 x 768 @ 85 Hz, 1280 x 1024 @ 60 Hz
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1024 x 768 @ 85 Hz
TypeKnown for one	FST CRT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one	1024 x 768 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	24.2 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	32.3 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features3 differ
Swivel angle rangeDiffers	45 - 45°	90 - 90°
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-4 - 15°	-5 - 13°
CertificationDiffers	UL, CSA, TUV, PTB, FCC-B, CE, NUTEK, ISO 9241, TUV/GS, TCO '95, IEC950, GOST, EPA Energy Star	BSMI, CCC, CE, C-Tick,DHS, eK, FCC-B, UL, CSA, FDA, GOST, IRAM, MIC, MPR-II, NOM, PSB, SEMKO, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	90 W	62 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240V; 50/60Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-25 - 65 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	421 mm	423.5 mm
HeightDiffers	419 mm	382 mm
WeightDiffers	14.7 kg	13.5 kg
WidthDiffers	405 mm	397 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	405 x 421 x 419 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	446 x 475 x 420 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.4 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 98/Me/2000/XP
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	1 x 15-pin HD D-Sub (HD-15)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Contrast, brightness, H/V-position, H/V-size, pincushion distortion, pin-balance, H/V-moire, trapezoid, parallelogram, language select, tilt, OSD-position, recall settings, reset settings	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons