Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo E74 17 vs Viewsonic E70mb 17"

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo E74 17 has 36.08 cm more viewable size diagonal than the Viewsonic E70mb 17" (40.4 cm vs 4.32 cm). The Viewsonic E70mb 17" has 1.2 kg more weight than the Lenovo E74 17 (16.2 kg vs 15 kg). Operating relative humidity (H-H): 10 - 80% on the Lenovo E74 17, 5 - 95% on the Viewsonic E70mb 17". Operating temperature (T-T): 5 - 45 °C on the Lenovo E74 17, 0 - 40 °C on the Viewsonic E70mb 17". Dimensions (WxDxH): 405 x 425 x 420 mm on the Lenovo E74 17, 406 x 435 x 357 mm on the Viewsonic E70mb 17".

  • Viewable size diagonal
    • E74 17:40.4 cm
    • E70mb 17":4.32 cm
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • E74 17:10 - 80%
    • E70mb 17":5 - 95%
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • E74 17:5 - 45 °C
    • E70mb 17":0 - 40 °C
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • E74 17:405 x 425 x 420 mm
    • E70mb 17":406 x 435 x 357 mm
  • Weight
    • E74 17:15 kg
    • E70mb 17":16.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of E74 17, E70mb 17"
30 specifications
Display1 differ
TypeKnown for oneFST CRTUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one24.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one32.3 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalDiffers40.4 cm4.32 cm
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one50 - 120 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 69 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.27Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280 x 1024 pixels
DisplayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCRT
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 70 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Display sRGBKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Featuresidentical
ErgonomicsKnown for oneiISO 9241 3/7/8Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO'99, CE, ISO9241-3,-7,- 8, TÜV/S,TUV GS, TUV/ ERGO, MPR-II, CCC, GOST-R, SASO, PCBC, BSMI, C-Tick, NOM, UL/cUL, DHHS, FCC-B, CB, ICES 003, Argentina
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one15-pin DUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power managementKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC 100–240 V, 50/60 Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for oneMoire control, Language Select, Manual Degauss, Brightness, Color point adjustment, Color point recall, Contrast, Digital Control, Horizontal centering, Keystone, Vertical centering, Zoom, Tilt, Reset to factory presets, Selectable color points (9300K and 6500K), Picture height, Picture width, PincuUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 80%5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 45 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 45 °C0 - 40 °C
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs405 x 425 x 420 mm406 x 435 x 357 mm
WeightDiffers15 kg16.2 kg
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source406 x 435 x 417 mm
Certificatesidentical
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneMPR-IIUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one-Microsoft Windows ME -Microsoft Windows 2000 -Microsoft Windows XPUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons