Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black vs Samsung Samtron 78E

9specifications compared
8differ
1identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black has 5.1 cm more viewable size diagonal than the Samsung Samtron 78E (45.7 cm vs 40.6 cm). The Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black has 0.02 more pixel pitch than the Samsung Samtron 78E (0.25 vs 0.23). The Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black has 20 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung Samtron 78E (100 W vs 80 W). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black, 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung Samtron 78E. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 96 kHz on the Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black, 30 - 70 kHz on the Samsung Samtron 78E.

Display diagonal
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:48.3 cm (19")
- Samtron 78E:43.2 cm (17")
Viewable size diagonal
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:45.7 cm
- Samtron 78E:40.6 cm
Horizontal scan range
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:30 - 96 kHz
- Samtron 78E:30 - 70 kHz
Pixel pitch
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:0.25
- Samtron 78E:0.23
Power consumption (typical)
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:100 W
- Samtron 78E:80 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:456 x 458 x 468 mm
- Samtron 78E:401 x 410 x 378 mm
Weight
- C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black:21.3 kg
- Samtron 78E:13.8 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black, Samtron 78E
25 specifications	A Lenovo C190 19" CRT .25 96kHz TCO99 black View product	B Samsung Samtron 78E View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
TypeKnown for one	Full Flat CRT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one	1280 x 1024 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	27.4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	36.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	45.7 cm	40.6 cm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 96 kHz	30 - 70 kHz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.25	0.23
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	325 x 244 mm
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024 @65Hz 1152x864 @77Hz 1024x768 @86Hz 800x600 @109Hz 640x480 @134Hz
Features1 differ
ErgonomicsKnown for one	ISO 9241 Part 3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	90 - 90°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	-5 - 15°	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	TCO99	TCO'03, CE, TÜV GS, ISO 9241/3,7,8
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	100 W	80 W
Power managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EPA, VESA DPMS
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110-240V; 50/60Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Brightness, Contrast, Degauss via Control Panel, Degauss via Power Switch, Digital Control, Geometry reset, Horizontal position, Horizontal size, Image rotation, Vertical size, Zoom, Keystone, Keystone Balance, Language Select, Moire control, OSD position, Selectable color points (9300K/6500K/5500K)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	456 x 458 x 468 mm	401 x 410 x 378 mm
WeightDiffers	21.3 kg	13.8 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	-Microsoft Windows ME -Microsoft Windows 2000 -Microsoft Windows XP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Video Dot RateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons