Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo C170 17 vs Samsung SyncMaster 795DF

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo C170 17 has 0.05 more pixel pitch than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (0.25 vs 0.2). The Samsung SyncMaster 795DF has 10 W more power consumption (typical) than the Lenovo C170 17 (80 W vs 70 W). The Lenovo C170 17 has 1.7 kg more weight than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (16 kg vs 14.3 kg). Certification: TCO99 on the Lenovo C170 17, TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8 on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF. Power management: ENERGY STAR on the Lenovo C170 17, EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000 on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF.

Pixel pitch
- C170 17:0.25
- SyncMaster 795DF:0.2
Certification
- C170 17:TCO99
- SyncMaster 795DF:TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
Power management
- C170 17:ENERGY STAR
- SyncMaster 795DF:EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
Power consumption (typical)
- C170 17:70 W
- SyncMaster 795DF:80 W
Weight
- C170 17:16 kg
- SyncMaster 795DF:14.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C170 17, SyncMaster 795DF
27 specifications	A Lenovo C170 17 View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 795DF View product
Display1 differ
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40.6 cm
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	325 x 244 mm
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.25	0.2
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1600x1200 @ 68 Hz 1280x1024 @ 79 Hz 1152x864 @ 93 Hz 1024x768 @ 104 Hz 800x600 @ 131 Hz 640x480 @ 160 Hz
TypeKnown for one	Flat CRT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one	1280 x 1024 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	24.4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	32.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationDiffers	TCO99	TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
ErgonomicsKnown for one	ISO 9241 Part 3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-4 - 10°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA (D-Sub)
Power2 differ
Power managementDiffers	ENERGY STAR	EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
Power consumption (typical)Differs	70 W	80 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110-240V; 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	410 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	378 mm
WeightDiffers	16 kg	14.3 kg
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	401 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	414 x 420 x 430 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Video Dot RateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185 MHz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Width, Video Input Level, Selectable Color Points 5000K/6500K/9300K, Tilt, Trapezoidal adjustment, Vertical centering, Manual Degauss, Moire control, OSD key auto repeat rate, OSD Menu position, Parallelogram, Pincushion, Pincushion Balanced, R.G.B. control, Language Select, Height, Horizontal cente	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons