Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo C170 17 vs Samsung Samtron 98PDF

9specifications compared
8differ
1identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo C170 17 has 0.05 more pixel pitch than the Samsung Samtron 98PDF (0.25 vs 0.20). The Samsung Samtron 98PDF has 30 W more power consumption (typical) than the Lenovo C170 17 (100 W vs 70 W). The Samsung Samtron 98PDF has 2.2 kg more weight than the Lenovo C170 17 (18.2 kg vs 16 kg). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Lenovo C170 17, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung Samtron 98PDF. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 85 kHz on the Lenovo C170 17, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung Samtron 98PDF.

Display diagonal
- C170 17:43.2 cm (17")
- Samtron 98PDF:48.3 cm (19")
Horizontal scan range
- C170 17:30 - 85 kHz
- Samtron 98PDF:30 - 96 kHz
Pixel pitch
- C170 17:0.25
- Samtron 98PDF:0.20
Power management
- C170 17:ENERGY STAR
- Samtron 98PDF:EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
Power consumption (typical)
- C170 17:70 W
- Samtron 98PDF:100 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- C170 17:414 x 420 x 430 mm
- Samtron 98PDF:445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
Weight
- C170 17:16 kg
- Samtron 98PDF:18.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C170 17, Samtron 98PDF
23 specifications	A Lenovo C170 17 View product	B Samsung Samtron 98PDF View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	48.3 cm (19")
TypeKnown for one	Flat CRT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one	1280 x 1024 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	24.4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	32.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 85 kHz	30 - 96 kHz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.25	0.20
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45.7 cm
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	366 x 275 mm
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920x1440 @64Hz 1800x1440 @64Hz 1856x1392 @66Hz 1792x1344 @68Hz 1600x1200 @76Hz 1280x1024 @89Hz 1152x864 @104Hz 1024x768 @116Hz 800x600 @146Hz 640x480 @160Hz
Features1 differ
ErgonomicsKnown for one	ISO 9241 Part 3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-4 - 10°	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	TCO99	TCO'03, TÜV GS, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Power managementDiffers	ENERGY STAR	EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
Power consumption (typical)Differs	70 W	100 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110-240V; 50/60 Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Width, Video Input Level, Selectable Color Points 5000K/6500K/9300K, Tilt, Trapezoidal adjustment, Vertical centering, Manual Degauss, Moire control, OSD key auto repeat rate, OSD Menu position, Parallelogram, Pincushion, Pincushion Balanced, R.G.B. control, Language Select, Height, Horizontal cente	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	414 x 420 x 430 mm	445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers	16 kg	18.2 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Video Dot RateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons