Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

HP mv7540e monitor CRT vs Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor

13specifications compared
11differ
2identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor has 90 - 90° more swivel angle range than the HP mv7540e monitor CRT (90 - 90° vs 0 - 90°). The Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor has 140 W more power consumption (typical) than the HP mv7540e monitor CRT (215 W vs 75 W). The Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor has 9.3 kg more weight than the HP mv7540e monitor CRT (26.3 kg vs 17 kg). Display diagonal: 40.6 cm (16") on the HP mv7540e monitor CRT, 55.9 cm (22") on the Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor. Type: CRT on the HP mv7540e monitor CRT, Shadow mask Real Flat CRT on the Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor.

Display diagonal
- mv7540e monitor CRT:40.6 cm (16")
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:55.9 cm (22")
Type
- mv7540e monitor CRT:CRT
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:Shadow mask Real Flat CRT
Horizontal scan range
- mv7540e monitor CRT:30 - 70 kHz
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:30 - 130 kHz
Maximum resolution
- mv7540e monitor CRT:1280 x 1024 pixels
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:2048 x 1536 pixels
Swivel angle range
- mv7540e monitor CRT:0 - 90°
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:90 - 90°
Tilt angle range
- mv7540e monitor CRT:5 - 15°
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:-5 - 25°
Power consumption (typical)
- mv7540e monitor CRT:75 W
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:215 W
Storage temperature (T-T)
- mv7540e monitor CRT:-30 - 60 °C
- 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor:-25 - 65 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of mv7540e, 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor
29 specifications	A HP mv7540e monitor CRT Model mv7540e View product	B Philips 22" Real Flat CRT Monitor View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	40.6 cm (16")	55.9 cm (22")
TypeDiffers	CRT	Shadow mask Real Flat CRT
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1024 x 768 pixels
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29.4 cm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	39.2 cm
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.5 cm
Vertical scan range	50 - 160 Hz	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 70 kHz	30 - 130 kHz
Maximum resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	2048 x 1536 pixels
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.25
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1600 x 1200
Features3 differ
Swivel angle rangeDiffers	0 - 90°	90 - 90°
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	5 - 15°	-5 - 25°
CertificationDiffers	FCC, Energy Star	CE Mark, E2000, FCC-B, UL, CSA, FDA, NUTEK, Energy Star, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo
Power LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	75 W	215 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Management featuresidentical
Control panelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Brightness control, Contrast control, Left / right, Menu, Power on / off, Up / down
Operational conditions2 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-30 - 60 °C	-25 - 65 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	50 - 95 °F	5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	501 x 466 x 501 mm
WeightDiffers	17 kg	26.3 kg
DepthKnown for one	424 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	406 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	404 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 98/ME/2000/XP
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	VGA	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons