Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Dell M992 monitor CRT vs Samsung SyncMaster 795DF

9specifications compared
9differ
0identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell M992 monitor CRT has 5.3 cm more viewable size diagonal than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (45.9 cm vs 40.6 cm). The Dell M992 monitor CRT has 54 mm more depth than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (464 mm vs 410 mm). The Dell M992 monitor CRT has 22 mm more height than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (400 mm vs 378 mm). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the Dell M992 monitor CRT, 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF. Pixel pitch: 0.243 x 0.243 mm on the Dell M992 monitor CRT, 0.2 on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF.

Display diagonal
- M992 monitor CRT:48.3 cm (19")
- SyncMaster 795DF:43.2 cm (17")
Viewable size diagonal
- M992 monitor CRT:45.9 cm
- SyncMaster 795DF:40.6 cm
Pixel pitch
- M992 monitor CRT:0.243 x 0.243 mm
- SyncMaster 795DF:0.2
Certification
- M992 monitor CRT:TCO '99, Energy Star
- SyncMaster 795DF:TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
Power requirements
- M992 monitor CRT:120 - 240
- SyncMaster 795DF:110-240V; 50/60Hz
Depth
- M992 monitor CRT:464 mm
- SyncMaster 795DF:410 mm
Height
- M992 monitor CRT:400 mm
- SyncMaster 795DF:378 mm
Weight
- M992 monitor CRT:21 kg
- SyncMaster 795DF:14.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of M992, SyncMaster 795DF
31 specifications	A Dell M992 monitor CRT Model M992 View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 795DF View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
TypeKnown for one	CRT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	27.4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	36.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	45.9 cm	40.6 cm
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	1600 x 1200 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.243 x 0.243 mm	0.2
Display sRGBKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 85 kHz
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	325 x 244 mm
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1600x1200 @ 68 Hz 1280x1024 @ 79 Hz 1152x864 @ 93 Hz 1024x768 @ 104 Hz 800x600 @ 131 Hz 640x480 @ 160 Hz
Features1 differ
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	TCO '99, Energy Star	TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power requirementsDiffers	120 - 240	110-240V; 50/60Hz
Power managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 3000 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	464 mm	410 mm
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	440 x 464 x 450 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightDiffers	400 mm	378 mm
WeightDiffers	21 kg	14.3 kg
WidthDiffers	440 mm	401 mm
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA (D-Sub)
Technical detailsidentical
Video Dot RateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons