Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace vs Lenovo ThinkVision C170

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace has 50 W more power consumption (typical) than the Lenovo ThinkVision C170 (120 W vs 70 W). Type: CRT on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, Flat CRT on the Lenovo ThinkVision C170. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 72 kHz on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, 30 - 85 kHz on the Lenovo ThinkVision C170. Pixel pitch: 0.21 x 0.25 mm on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, 0.25 on the Lenovo ThinkVision C170. Certification: UL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GS on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, TCO'03 on the Lenovo ThinkVision C170.

Type
- 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:CRT
- ThinkVision C170:Flat CRT
Horizontal scan range
- 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:30 - 72 kHz
- ThinkVision C170:30 - 85 kHz
Pixel pitch
- 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:0.21 x 0.25 mm
- ThinkVision C170:0.25
Certification
- 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:UL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GS
- ThinkVision C170:TCO'03
Power consumption (typical)
- 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:120 W
- ThinkVision C170:70 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, ThinkVision C170
29 specifications	A AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace View product	B Lenovo ThinkVision C170 View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonal	43.2 cm (17")	43.2 cm (17")
TypeDiffers	CRT	Flat CRT
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1024 x 768 pixels
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 72 kHz	30 - 85 kHz
Maximum resolution	1280 x 1024 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.21 x 0.25 mm	0.25
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	40.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	300 x 230 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	640x350@70Hz, 720x400@70Hz, 640x480@60/72/75/85Hz, 800x600@60/72/75/85Hz, 1024x768@60/70/75/85Hz, 1280x1024@60/75/85Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
ErgonomicsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO Standard 9241 Part 3
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-4 - 10°
CertificationDiffers	UL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GS	TCO'03
Product colourKnown for one	Grey	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	120 W	70 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 W
Monitor maximum power consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Brightness, Color point adjustment, Color point recall, Contrast, Geometry reset, Height, Horizontal centering, Language Select, Manual Degauss, Moire control
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 80%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 60 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	414 x 420 x 430 mm
Weight	16 kg	16 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	410 x 420 x 402 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	MPRII	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	VESA, XGA, SVGA, VGA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Video Dot RateKnown for one	110 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons