Product comparison · 2 monitor lights

BenQ ScreenBar Pro vs Hama To Go

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 3identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama To Go has 408 mm more depth than the BenQ ScreenBar Pro (500 mm vs 92 mm). Control type: Buttons on the BenQ ScreenBar Pro, Touch on the Hama To Go.

  • Control type
    • ScreenBar Pro:Buttons
    • To Go:Touch
  • Depth
    • ScreenBar Pro:92 mm
    • To Go:500 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ScreenBar Pro, To Go
21 specifications
Features1 differ
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Aluminium, Polycarbonate (PC), ZincUnknown — not stated by the source
Luminous fluxKnown for one1000 lmUnknown — not stated by the source
Color Rendering Index (CRI)Known for one95Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour temperature (min)Known for one2700 KUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour temperature (max)Known for one6500 KUnknown — not stated by the source
DimmableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffersButtonsTouch
Number of LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
Poweridentical
DC voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one1.7 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one135 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthDiffers92 mm500 mm
HeightKnown for one500 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one620 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source230 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source140 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor light comparisons

All monitor light comparisons