Product comparison · 2 modems

NETGEAR ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router vs TP-Link TD-W8901N modem

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 3identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The NETGEAR ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router has 117 mm more depth than the TP-Link TD-W8901N modem (245 mm vs 128 mm). The NETGEAR ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router has 71 mm more height than the TP-Link TD-W8901N modem (106 mm vs 35 mm). The NETGEAR ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router has 98 mm more width than the TP-Link TD-W8901N modem (280 mm vs 182 mm). Interface: IEEE, 802.11g, 8 x 10/100Mbps RJ-45 on the NETGEAR ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router, RJ11 on the TP-Link TD-W8901N modem.

  • Depth
    • ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router:245 mm
    • TD-W8901N modem:128 mm
  • Height
    • ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router:106 mm
    • TD-W8901N modem:35 mm
  • Width
    • ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router:280 mm
    • TD-W8901N modem:182 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ProSafe Wireless ADSL Modem VPN Firewall Router, TD-W8901N
30 specifications
B

TP-Link

TD-W8901N modem

Model TD-W8901N

View product
Modem1 differ
Modem typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceADSL2+
InterfaceDiffersIEEE, 802.11g, 8 x 10/100Mbps RJ-45RJ11
Antenna typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOmni directional, Undetachable, Reverse SMA
Modem speedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one32 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
MAC address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u
Routing protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIGRP, RIP-1, RIP-2
Supported protocolsDiffers-Network: IP routing, TCP/IP, UDP, ICMP, PPPoE -IP Addressing: DHCP (client and server) -Routing: Static, RIPv1, RIPv2 -VPN/Security: IPSec (ESP, AH), MD5, SHA-1, DES, 3DES, IKE, PKI, AESATM Forum UNI3.1/4.0, PPP over ATM (RFC 2364), PPP over Ethernet (RFC2516), IPoA (RFC1577/2225), PVC - Up to 8 PVCs.
Featuresidentical
Firewall securityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNAT Firewall, SPI Firewall, MAC / IP / Packet / Application / URL Filtering, Denial of Service(DoS), SYN Flooding, Ping of Death
Security algorithmsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source128-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK
Switch typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceManaged
Built-in processorKnown for one266 Mhz 32-bit RISCUnknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Poweridentical
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9VDC/0.6A
System requirementsidentical
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft Windows 98SE, NT, 2000, XP, Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8, MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX, Linux
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, FCC, RoHS
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers245 mm128 mm
HeightDiffers106 mm35 mm
WidthDiffers280 mm182 mm
WeightKnown for one2.19 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLAN (RJ-45), Phone (RJ-11)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More modem comparisons

All modem comparisons