Product comparison · 2 modems

FRITZ!Card DSL USB vs HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500 has 93.5 mm more depth than the FRITZ!Card DSL USB (171.5 mm vs 78 mm). The HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500 has 67.5 mm more height than the FRITZ!Card DSL USB (90.5 mm vs 23 mm). The FRITZ!Card DSL USB has 69 g more weight than the HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500 (100 g vs 31 g). Only the HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500 has internal. Modem speed: No on the FRITZ!Card DSL USB, 33.6 Kbit/s on the HP LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500.

  • Modem speed
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:No
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:33.6 Kbit/s
  • Internal
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:No
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:Yes
  • Depth
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:78 mm
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:171.5 mm
  • Height
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:23 mm
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:90.5 mm
  • Weight
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:100 g
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:31 g
  • Width
    • FRITZ!Card DSL USB:102 mm
    • LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500:295.3 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FRITZ!Card DSL USB, LaserJet MFP Analog Fax Accessory 500
32 specifications
Modem1 differ
Modem typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceV.34
Modem speedDiffersNo33.6 Kbit/s
HP segmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness, Enterprise
InterfaceKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRed
InternalDiffersNoYes
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHP Color LaserJet CM3530 HP Color LaserJet Enterprise CM4540 HP LaserJet Enterprise M4555
Ports & interfacesidentical
Modem (RJ-11) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
I/O portsKnown for one1 x RJ45Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers78 mm171.5 mm
HeightDiffers23 mm90.5 mm
WeightDiffers100 g31 g
WidthDiffers102 mm295.3 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source171.5 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90.5 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source510 g
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source295.3 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 pc(s)
Pallet gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source142 g
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source240 pc(s)
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1200 x 1000 x 1839 mm
Technical detailsidentical
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1219.2 x 1016 x 1841.5 mm (48 x 40 x 72.5")
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source141.5 kg (312 lbs)
Performanceidentical
Upstream data rateKnown for one1 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Downstream data rateKnown for one8 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum fax transfer rateKnown for one14.4 KbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital signal protocolKnown for oneADSL (PPPoE/PPPoA, ATM AAL5, G.992.1, G.994.1)Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum RAMKnown for one32 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for onePentium IIIUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows XP, Windows 2000, Windows Me, Windows 98 (SE), LinuxUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More modem comparisons

All modem comparisons